Sadiq Khan has warned London Assembly Members that time is running out to avert the collapse of Transport for London, saying the capital’s public transport network will run out of money on 17 October 17 and that negotiations with Whitehall to have a new deal in place by the end of this month had begun “in earnest” only yesterday.
The Mayor also told a plenary session of the Assembly today that a government review of TfL finances, structure and governance, set up to inform future funding arrangements with a 31 August deadline, is still to report.
The eleventh-hour bailout agreed between TfL and government in May saw £1.6 billion funding provided for the period to mid-October only. TfL budget proposals now under discussion with Whitehall would require a further £2 billion for the second half of 2020/21 plus £2.9 billion to see the network through 2021/22, AMs heard.
The dramatic drop in passenger numbers in London has seen TfL – almost totally reliant on fare income to cover costs – losing £100 million a week, Khan said. He called on the government to recognise the importance of the network for London and the country as a whole: “If the government wants a national recovery it needs a London recovery. Our city and our country need TfL working properly.”
And again he warned the government against “punishing” Londoners for following lockdown rules by avoiding public transport. “My worry is that the government will play party politics,” he said. “But it is not right for party allegiances to get in the way of what is right for our capital city.”
The Mayor confirmed that City Hall is seeking long-term 10-to-15-year government funding, coupled with more devolved power to raise its own money. “A sustainable transport system is vital for the capital,” he said. “The last 20 years have shown the progress that an integrated transport authority can make for the prosperity of our city. If we had more devolution we could be in charge of our own destiny.”
One option would be more City Hall control over the £500 million in vehicle excise duty collected annually from London’s vehicle owners, none of which is currently allocated towards road maintenance or construction in the capital, the meeting heard.
Khan also condemned the “lie” that TfL’s “cupboard was bare” before the pandemic crisis. TfL finance chief Simon Kilonback confirmed a £1 billion reduction in operating costs since 2016, deficits reduced by 86%, cash balances up by 31% and plans in place for the network to break even by 2022.
TfL is obliged to run as a “going concern” to provide sufficient confidence to lenders and service providers, with major investment projects such as the replacement of the Piccadilly Line’s 50-year-old trains running over many years and bus companies requiring significant security to underpin their own investment in services, Kilonback said. TfL has nevertheless been required to spend £1 billion of its own reserves as the pandemic struck, he added, in contrast to national train operating companies which had been “bailed out on day one”.
Kilonback also confirmed that TfL budget assumptions were based on running a full service, allowing passengers to travel safely, and the likelihood of a second infection peak in the winter, with continuing reductions in fare income. Ridership was currently forecast to remain 70% down on pre-pandemic levels, returning to 80% of pre-pandemic ridership only by April 2022 if social distancing measures come to an end in May next year.
And he warned that there was no “easy money” to come out if funding is cut. “The only things we could do going forward would be linked to reduction of services”.
Khan’s transport deputy Heidi Alexander, also at the meeting, proved sceptical of “First Ride Free” plans reportedly being considered by the government and TfL, offering a free trip into the capital as part of efforts to encourage people back to the West End.
“I’m not sure people’s reluctance to come back to central London is about the price of a tube ticket,” she told assembly members. “We need to remain very conscious of the possibility of a second wave. We don’t want to encourage a lot of people all back at the same time. We have to maintain social distancing on the network.”
OnLondon.co.uk exists to provide fair and thorough coverage of the UK capital’s politics, development and culture. It depends greatly on donations from readers. Give £5 a month or £50 a year and you will receive the On London Extra Thursday email, which rounds up London news, views and information from a wide range of sources. Click here to donate directly or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com for bank account details. Thanks.
More money? What about all the money which was handed out to Local Councils for ill thought out and disastrous road schemes, introduced without consultation or research because Central Government via TfL wanted to be seen to be doing something about transport during Covid in the Capital. Many of these local schemes are now being abandoned and removed. At what cost, both financial and to the well being of local communities. Now more money is required, this is a scandal. This fiasco should be properly and independently investigated and those responsible made to take responsibility. Stop asking for more money and then wasting it. When are you going to learn that you can’t just impose measures at speed, without proper consultation and full understanding of local issues and circumstances. Disgraceful waste of money which could have been used to improve transport for all. I live in the Borough of Wandsworth, check out the mess you’ve caused there, and don’t go trying to shift all the blame onto the Council. TfL are responsible for the irresponsible and dangerous measures on the A24 and while the Council, does bear its share of the responsibility, it has had the sense to listen to the local community and dismantle its road blockages. TfL should take a close look at its measures and listen to the local community. You’re spending money just for the sake of it. A sad PR exercise. Stop, consider and above all have the humility to listen to those you purport to be serving.
Hi. The money for the new Low Traffic Neighbourhoods, which is what I think you are referring to, was provided by the government for distribution to local authorities by Transport for London. Sadiq Khan welcomed the funding, but the creation of the LTNs themselves was required by national government as a condition of TfL receiving emergency financial assistance after the pandemic caused its income from public transport fares to disappear. The letter to Sadiq Khan from transport secretary Grant Shapps of 14 May setting out the conditions for the emergency assistance spells this out as follows: “TfL agrees to…pushing forward an ambitious Active Travel Plan to promote cycling and walking, including new segregated cycle lanes, closure of roads to through traffic and pavement extensions utilising at least the £55m allocated in the [financial] support period.” The LTNs are primarily an initiative of Boris Johnson’s national government, not the Mayor.